Skip to main content

The Fog of Accountability

How Institutions Keep Voters from Holding Their Local Governments Accountable

The Fog of Accountability

How Institutions Keep Voters from Holding Their Local Governments Accountable

An astute, data-rich examination of the structural reasons that elections fail to hold US city officials accountable.

In the United States, hundreds of thousands of elected and appointed officials serve more than 50,000 subnational governments, making important decisions about services ranging from education to infrastructure to policing. The provision of critical city services shapes citizens’ everyday lives.

Supposedly, local politicians are the elected representatives closest to the people they serve, but are they actually accountable to their constituents? Justin de Benedictis-Kessner shows that they are not: local elections routinely fail to punish bad politicians or reward strong performers. The Fog of Accountability argues that this is because urban politics is defined by minimally effective competition, complex institutions that confuse voters, and a lack of effective media coverage. These institutional features combine to stymie even well-intentioned voters and make accountability difficult. Fixing these problems is challenging, but, as de Benedictis-Kessner shows, change is possible if we can enable citizens to reclaim and assert their political power.


272 pages | 60 halftones, 9 tables | 6 x 9

Chicago Studies in American Politics

Political Science: American Government and Politics, Urban Politics

Reviews

"It’s a rare feat to stare into the fog and emerge with deep insight, but that’s exactly what de Benedictis-Kessner’s book accomplishes. Observers of American politics have long thought that local governments’ proximity to their citizens makes it easier for voters to hold politicians accountable. But through state-of-the-art analyses of survey and election data, this book upends that view. Complex institutions, uncompetitive elections, and thin media coverage conspire to limit local accountability."   

Daniel Hopkins | University of Pennsylvania

"de Benedictis-Kessner has collected incredible data and provided readers with inventive analyses that contribute much to our knowledge of accountability in local government.”

Brian Schaffner | coauthor of "Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail"

"Can democracy function in our smallest communities? In this meticulously researched account, de Benedictis-Kessner offers reason for skepticism. Due to a paucity of information, anemic electoral competition, overlapping and confusing responsibilities, holding elected officials accountable for failures and rewarding them for successes is often elusive (though not impossible). Using incredible new data, this book deftly moves between individual and aggregate patterns to present a clear-eyed, holistic account of local elections.”

Jessica Trounstine | author of "Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities"

Table of Contents

List of Illustrations

1. The Fog of Accountability in Cities
2. Voter Knowledge Deficits Hinder Accountability
3. Ineffective Competition in Local Elections
4. Visible and Simple Problems Drive Incumbent Fortunes
5. Blurred Lines: Complex Institutions Complicate Accountability
6. Foggy Problems: How the Media Helps Voters Overcome Information Barriers
7. Strategic Finger-Pointing Can Hinder Accountability and Protect Incumbents
8. Closest to the People?

Acknowledgments
Notes
Bibliography
Index

Be the first to know

Get the latest updates on new releases, special offers, and media highlights when you subscribe to our email lists!

Sign up here for updates about the Press